EEOC Issues Proposed Regulations to Implement the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act
ABSTRACT: EEOC publishes proposed regulations to implement the Pregnant Worker Fairness Act, which became effective on June 27, 2023.
The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) went into effect on June 27, 2023. On August 11, 2023, the EEOC published its proposed regulations implementing the new law in the Federal Register. Public comments will be accepted through October 10, 2023. The EEOC has until December 29, 2023 to issue the final regulations. The regulations once finalized will provide detailed guidance from the agency on the scope of workers’ rights and the employers’ obligations under this new law.
We covered the basics of the PWFA in our July 28th blog (Baker Sterchi PWFA Blog 7.28.23). As a reminder, under the new law, employers with at least 15 employees are required to provide “reasonable accommodations” to employees known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions, unless the accommodation will cause the employer an “undue hardship”.
The 275+ pages of proposed regulations borrow heavily from definitions and concepts included in the Americans with Disabilities Act and Title VII, and their implementing regulations. This is a positive development since most employers and employees are already familiar with the ins and outs of these laws. For instance, the PWFA relies on the same or substantially similar definitions of “pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions,” “reasonable accommodation,” “essential function,” and “undue hardship.” The proposed regulations also embrace the same process for filing a charge, the same available remedies and limitations, as well as the familiar concept of the required interactive process for discussing possible accommodations with employees.
An important distinction between an employer’s obligation to provide a reasonable accommodation under the ADA and the parallel PWFA requirement is that the proposed PWFA regulations provide protection to workers who are temporarily unable to perform the essential functions of their positions, so long as the worker is able to resume those duties in the “near future.” The regulations then propose defining the term “near future” as approximately 40 weeks. Recognizing that post-pregnancy complications are common, the proposed rules further provide the 40-week period could “restart” after the employee gives birth. The Commission is also seeking public comment on whether the 40-week period should be expanded to 52 weeks.
The regulations propose an expansive view of protected conditions that will include current, past, or potential pregnancy, lactation, use of birth control, menstruation, infertility and fertility treatments, endometriosis, miscarriage, stillbirth, or having or choosing not to have an abortion, as well as high blood pressure, anxiety, or even carpal tunnel syndrome when related to the workers’ pregnancy or birth of a child.
The proposed regulations also identify “predictable assessments” of undue hardships, which are essentially modifications that will, in almost every situation, be found to be “reasonable accommodations” under the PWFA that do not impose an undue hardship when requested by an employee due to pregnancy. They include the following accommodations, which would be permitted as needed: (1) carrying water or being permitted to drink in the employee’s work area; (2) allowing additional restroom breaks; (3) allowing employees to sit or stand; and (4) allowing breaks to eat and drink. These accommodations are expected to be provided in nearly all circumstances without medical documentation.
Stay tuned for another update once the public comment period closes and the final regulations are implemented.

EEOC Enters into First Settlement Involving AI Software Discrimination ...

Supreme Court Reverses Standard for "Undue Hardship" in Title VII Religious Accommodation Cases ...
About Employment & Labor Law Blog
Baker Sterchi's Employment & Labor Law Blog examines topics and developments of interest to employers, Human Resources professionals, and others with an interest in recent legal developments concerning the workplace. This blog is focused on Missouri, Illinois and Kansas law, and on major developments under federal law, and at the EEOC and NLRB. Learn more about the editor, David M. Eisenberg, and our Employment & Labor practice.
Subscribe via email
Subscribe to rss feeds
RSS FeedsABOUT baker sterchi blogs
Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC (Baker Sterchi) publishes this website as a service to our clients, colleagues and others, for informational purposes only. These materials are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship, and are not a substitute for sound legal advice. You should not base any action or lack of action on any information included in our website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. If you contact us through our website or via email, no attorney-client relationship is created, and no confidential information should be transmitted. Communication with Baker Sterchi by e-mail or other transmissions over the Internet may not be secure, and you should not send confidential electronic messages that are not adequately encrypted.
The hiring of an attorney is an important decision, which should not be based solely on information appearing on our website. To the extent our website has provided links to other Internet resources, those links are not under our control, and we are not responsible for their content. We do our best to provide you current, accurate information; however, we cannot guarantee that this information is the most current, correct or complete. In addition, you should not take this information as a promise or indication of future results.
Disclaimer
The Employment & Labor Law Blog is made available by Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. Your use of this blog site alone creates no attorney client relationship between you and the firm.
Confidential information
Do not include confidential information in comments or other feedback or messages related to the Employment & Labor Law Blog, as these are neither confidential nor secure methods of communicating with attorneys. The Employment & Labor Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.