City of Lancaster Uses AI to Process Construction Permit Applications
ABSTRACT: Municipalities are beginning to use agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) to process construction permit applications, reduce backlogs and improve efficiency. The trend offers opportunities for faster project approvals but also raises oversight, transparency, and risk management considerations.
As society moves beyond using generative AI for specific tasks and toward autonomous, agentic AI for decision-making and execution, the construction industry is likewise enjoying the operational benefits of AI. AI tools are helping industry participants to perform a broad range of tasks more quickly and efficiently, thereby reducing operational costs while improving workflow and project timelines.
One notable example is the use of AI in construction permitting. In 2024, the City of Lancaster, California, became one of the first municipalities to use an AI platform to process and issue permit applications for construction projects within city limits. The move marked a shift from traditional manual review toward automated municipal processes. Since then, the Governor of California has implemented a number of additional laws allowing the use of AI by municipalities to process permits, particularly in light of the increased need for permits resulting from homes damaged or destroyed by natural disasters.
Municipal Adoption and Early Results
While the approach drew criticism, the city reported that AI permitting helped reduced application backlogs and provided much-needed relief to an overextended staff. Rather than replacing human decision-making, the system was intended to handle routine or ministerial portions of the permitting process, allowing staff to focus on more complex reviews requiring judgment and oversight.
The project was so successful that Los Angeles County followed suit to keep pace with permit demands driven by fires and other catastrophic events. The hope is that the AI-driven acceleration of rebuilding permit approvals will help communities recover more quickly after devastating fires.
AI as a Response to Staffing and Resource Constraints
As government shut downs and cutbacks plague all facets of the United States, the increased use of AI by municipalities to automate routine or ministerial tasks may offer a viable, efficient solution to address gaps created by an ever-shrinking workforce, allowing municipalities to focus limited resources on projects and decisions that require human oversight.
The Growing Role of AI in Construction Litigation
The construction industry’s reliance on AI is not limited to permitting. Construction attorneys are also beginning to use AI tools to review and manage the large volumes of documents involved in dispute resolution and litigation. Complex construction matters often include thousands of records, ranging from contracts and change orders to financial data and project communications. AI can assist in organizing, identifying and analyzing these materials more efficiently than traditional manual review alone.
Agentic AI, in particular, can streamline the review process in complex construction disputes, helping legal teams identify relevant information more quickly and reduce time spent on repetitive tasks. The potential efficiencies are substantial, especially in large-scale matters involving multiple parties and extensive records.
Ethical and Confidentiality Considerations
Despite these benefits, the use of AI in legal practice carries significant risk. Construction litigation frequently involves sensitive financial information, confidential project details and attorney work product. One of the most immediate concerns associated with AI is the potential inadvertent disclosure.
Nearly all 50 states have adopted rules addressing a lawyer’s duty of technological competence, which includes competence in the use of AI tools. ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, including Rules 1.1, 1..4, 1.6, 5.1 and 5.3, along with related state ethics rules and opinions, provide the framework for use of AI by lawyers. These rules require lawyers to understand the technology they use and to supervise staff, consultants, third-party vendors and witnesses who use AI tools in the practice of law.
Construction practitioners should be aware of these rules as they navigate the challenges of increased use of agentic AI in the industry. Technology can improve efficiency, but it does not replace the need for professional judgment, supervision and careful protection of client information.
Key Takeaways
The use of AI to process construction permits illustrates a broader shift toward automation across both government and private sectors. For municipalities, AI offers a way to address staffing shortages and reduce administrative bottlenecks. For developers and contractors, it may mean faster project approvals and greater predictability. For construction lawyers, AI presents opportunities to manage complex data more effectively while also creating new ethical and risk management considerations.
As adoption grows, organizations that combine AI-driven efficiency with clear oversight, transparency and governance will be better positioned to realize the benefits of this evolving technology.About Construction Law Blog
Subscribe via email
Subscribe to rss feeds
RSS FeedsABOUT baker sterchi blogs
Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC (Baker Sterchi) publishes this website as a service to our clients, colleagues and others, for informational purposes only. These materials are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship, and are not a substitute for sound legal advice. You should not base any action or lack of action on any information included in our website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. If you contact us through our website or via email, no attorney-client relationship is created, and no confidential information should be transmitted. Communication with Baker Sterchi by e-mail or other transmissions over the Internet may not be secure, and you should not send confidential electronic messages that are not adequately encrypted.
The hiring of an attorney is an important decision, which should not be based solely on information appearing on our website. To the extent our website has provided links to other Internet resources, those links are not under our control, and we are not responsible for their content. We do our best to provide you current, accurate information; however, we cannot guarantee that this information is the most current, correct or complete. In addition, you should not take this information as a promise or indication of future results.
Disclaimer
The Construction Law Blog is made available by Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. Your use of this blog site alone creates no attorney client relationship between you and the firm.
Confidential information
Do not include confidential information in comments or other feedback or messages related to the Construction Law Blog, as these are neither confidential nor secure methods of communicating with attorneys. The Construction Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.











