Missouri Allows the Formation of "Rent-A-Captive" Insurers
ABSTRACT: New Missouri laws taking effect on August 28, 2013 will allow the creation of "rent-a-captive" insurers and revise existing captive insurance laws to be more favorable to captive formation. This marks an aggressive move by Missouri to muscle in on the captive insurance market.
A captive insurance company is a risk-management organization that is formed by one or more non-insurer parent companies, usually to provide more affordable coverage for risk. Captives are a form of self-insurance, but with defined “policy terms” that can make it easier for the company to obtain affordable coverage (including more affordable layers of coverage through excess policies and reinsurance). With a captive insurer, the parent(s) can recover “premium” amounts that were not needed to pay claims.
There are two broad categories of captive insurers. “Direct” or “pure” captive insurers are owned by a single parent company and directly insures only its parent’s risk. Group captives will provide insurance to multiple companies, often affiliated companies or members of a shared industry.
Captive insurers are popular – estimates are that most Fortune 500 companies have some form of captive insurance. The vast majority of captives are domiciled off-shore, with Bermuda the leading destination for formation of a captive carrier. Vermont holds the title for U.S. state with the largest share of the captive business.
Missouri is looking to change that, by making existing captive regulations more favorable and by expanding the types of locally-domiciled captives to include “sponsored” captive insurers. Taking effect on August 28, 2013, Senate Bill 287 adopts a number of provisions favorable to companies looking to establish a captive carrier in Missouri.
Missouri will now allow for the creation of sponsored, protected-cell captives (also known as “rent-a-captives”). A sponsored captive may be incorporated as one of four types of entity: (1) a stock insurer with its stock divided into shares held by the stockholders, (2) a mutual corporation, (3) a non-profit corporation, or (4) a member-managed limited liability company.
The sponsor need not be an insurance company, but must be approved by the director of insurance in its discretion, after an evaluation of the financial stability and experience of the sponsor. Risk retention groups may not sponsor or participate in a captive insurer in Missouri.
Participants in a sponsored captive can include associations, corporations, LLCs, partnerships, trusts, and other business entities. The sponsor may also be a participant.
The capital requirement for a sponsored captive is only $500,000, and the minimum premium tax is $7,500 for the captive as a whole (not as to each protected cell). The maximum tax liability is calculated as an aggregate of each cell’s liability, however. The assets of two or more protected cells may be combined for purposes of investment, and this combination does not defeat the limited liability and segregation of assets for claims-processing and accounting purposes.
Missouri has historically seen a small market share of the captive business. Its move to allow rent-a-captives, particularly because sponsors need not be licensed insurers, is an aggressive move to increase Missouri’s participation in the captive insurer market.
related services
About Insurance Law Blog
Baker Sterchi's Insurance Blog examines topics and developments of interest to insurance carriers, with a particular focus on Missouri, Illinois and Kansas law. Learn more about our blog editors, Richard Woolf and Philip Sumner, and our Insurance practice.
Subscribe via email
Subscribe to rss feeds
RSS FeedsABOUT baker sterchi blogs
Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC (Baker Sterchi) publishes this website as a service to our clients, colleagues and others, for informational purposes only. These materials are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship, and are not a substitute for sound legal advice. You should not base any action or lack of action on any information included in our website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. If you contact us through our website or via email, no attorney-client relationship is created, and no confidential information should be transmitted. Communication with Baker Sterchi by e-mail or other transmissions over the Internet may not be secure, and you should not send confidential electronic messages that are not adequately encrypted.
The hiring of an attorney is an important decision, which should not be based solely on information appearing on our website. To the extent our website has provided links to other Internet resources, those links are not under our control, and we are not responsible for their content. We do our best to provide you current, accurate information; however, we cannot guarantee that this information is the most current, correct or complete. In addition, you should not take this information as a promise or indication of future results.
Disclaimer
The Insurance Law Blog is made available by Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. Your use of this blog site alone creates no attorney client relationship between you and the firm.
Confidential information
Do not include confidential information in comments or other feedback or messages related to the Insurance Law Blog, as these are neither confidential nor secure methods of communicating with attorneys. The Insurance Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.