CFPB has joined the game – Identifies Consumer risks in virtual worlds and video games
ABSTRACT: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has turned the gaze of its regulatory authority onto the video games industry as financial products and services become a bigger part of virtual entertainment.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) has vowed to monitor non-traditional markets where financial products and services may be offered, including video games and virtual worlds. In April, the CFPB released an Issue Spotlight identifying a number of concerning issues regarding gaming markets and virtual worlds.
The Issue Spotlight does not impose legal obligations on video game companies or the entities overseeing virtual worlds, nor does it give an official interpretation of any law or regulation. However, the CFPB encourages those entities to evaluate their legal obligations and responsibilities and act accordingly.
The CFPB estimates that the value of the global gaming industry is $250 billion annually, and that figure is expected to surpass $320 billion by 2026. As the value of the gaming and virtual worlds industry has increased, digital assets associated with them have become increasingly valuable. The CFPB says operators often take a “buyer beware” approach that leaves aggrieved games little-to-no recourse when problems arise.
Key Findings from the Issue Spotlight
Financial services providers have begun entering the gaming industry in the form of payment processing, money transmission, and even loans as the value of assets flowing in and out gaming marketplaces increase. With the rise in the value of gaming assets, users report an increasing number of hacking attempts, account theft, scams, and unauthorized transactions that result in lost access; the CFPB is critical of gaming and virtual world operators not providing the kinds of consumer protections that apply to traditional banking and payment systems.
The CFPB also recognizes that gaming publishers often collect huge amounts of surveillance data about from their users. The data collected includes location data, social media data, and behavioral data, such as how a player responds to personalized incentives. The CFPB identified consumer risks and potential harm related to user data being sold, bought, or traded between companies, including transferring data for purposes outside of game play. The CFPB also identified using collected data to monetize game play in a manner that may take advantage of consumers’ proclivities to entice more spending as an area of concern.
The CFPB identified a number of ways operators can make money on user data including microtransactions, discriminatory pricing, and advertising. The CFPB highlighted the use of behavioral, biometric, and personal data to manipulate prices and availability of goods or services and obscuring the real value of the same as a particular area of concern. The CFPB questioned whether proper privacy regulations are being adhered to and whether consumers were fully aware of how their data is being used by operators.
Additional Concerns Highlighted by the Issue Spotlight
The CFPB analyzed concerns arising form gaming assets having substantial monetary value and highlighted issues related to account vulnerability, money laundering, and fraud. The monetary value of player accounts and/or ability to cash-out gaming assets has led to an influx of phishing attempts and reports of account theft. Industry experts consider young gamers especially at risk to phishing attempts because of both their social media activity and lack of awareness about social engineering tactics. The CFPB highlighted the limited recourse operators provide for players reporting hacking attempts, account theft, scam, unauthorized transactions or losing access to game currencies and virtual items. Some gamers have reported that pursuing fraud related recourse from their financial institutions has resulted in play accounts being locked or terminated.
The capacity to transfer and convert crypto assets or gaming assets to fiat currency has given rise to using gaming platforms and virtual worlds as a vehicle for money laundering. The CFPB notes that ill gotten money can be used to buy gaming assets which can be converted back into fiat currency; the transfers can obfuscate the trail of illegally acquired funds.
The CFPB has explicitly highlighted the wide popularity of video games and virtual worlds with young players as a basis for extra concern regarding these issues.
Conclusion
The role of banks and consumer finance products within gaming is evolving, and as it does the CFPB will seemingly look to expand its regulatory authority to include overseeing the financial services and products available in virtual worlds and video games.
Baker Sterchi attorneys can help companies assess their liabilities related to the CFPB’s regulatory overwatch. If you would like to learn more about this issue or our firm contact Baker Sterchi’s financial services practice group.
Resolution Regarding Litigation Challenging CFPB Rule Capping Late Fees May Have Lasting Impact. ...

Litigation challenging CFPB Rule capping late fees likely to resolve soon. ...
About Financial Services Law Blog
Baker Sterchi's Financial Services Law Blog explores current events, litigation trends, regulations, and hot topics in the financial services industry. This blog informs readers of issues affecting a wide range of financial services, including mortgage lending, auto finance, and credit card/retail transactions. Learn more about the editor, Megan Stumph-Turner, and our Financial Services practice.
Subscribe via email
Subscribe to rss feeds
RSS FeedsABOUT baker sterchi blogs
Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC (Baker Sterchi) publishes this website as a service to our clients, colleagues and others, for informational purposes only. These materials are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship, and are not a substitute for sound legal advice. You should not base any action or lack of action on any information included in our website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. If you contact us through our website or via email, no attorney-client relationship is created, and no confidential information should be transmitted. Communication with Baker Sterchi by e-mail or other transmissions over the Internet may not be secure, and you should not send confidential electronic messages that are not adequately encrypted.
The hiring of an attorney is an important decision, which should not be based solely on information appearing on our website. To the extent our website has provided links to other Internet resources, those links are not under our control, and we are not responsible for their content. We do our best to provide you current, accurate information; however, we cannot guarantee that this information is the most current, correct or complete. In addition, you should not take this information as a promise or indication of future results.
Disclaimer
The Financial Services Law Blog is made available by Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. Your use of this blog site alone creates no attorney client relationship between you and the firm.
Confidential information
Do not include confidential information in comments or other feedback or messages related to the Financial Services Law Blog, as these are neither confidential nor secure methods of communicating with attorneys. The Financial Services Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.