CFPB Issues New Rule Precluding Collection and Reporting of Consumer Medical Debt
ABSTRACT: On March 8, 2025, a final rule from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) will become effective. The rule amends Regulation V, which implements the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), to prohibit collection and reporting of consumer medical debt.
On January 7, 2025 the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued a final rule amending Regulation V, which implements the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”); the new rule removes an exception to the FCRA which allowed the collecting and reporting of consumer medical debt information for credit eligibility determinations. The CFPB estimates that the new rule will impact the credit reports of approximately 15 million consumers; they also estimate that $49 billion worth of medical debt will be removed from consumer credit reports.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act and the 2005 Medical Debt Exception
The FCRA, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. originally enacted in 1970, regulates the collection, dissemination, and use of consumer information, including consumer credit information. Specifically, the FCRA regulates: (1) consumer reporting agencies (i.e. Equifax, Transunion, and Experian); (2) users of consumer reports; and (3) furnishers of consumer information. The FCRA limits how information in a consumer credit report can be used by companies and who can use the information; it also requires notification to a consumer when their credit report is obtained and used by a company.
The FCRA also creates a number of obligations for creditors in providing consumer information. The creditor must: (1) provide complete and accurate information to the reporting agencies; (2) Investigate consumer disputes received from reporting agencies; (3) correct, delete or verify information, meeting certain time and investigatory obligations, when notified of a dispute; and (4) inform consumers about negative information placed on their credit report.
The FCRA precludes the use of a consumer’s medical information in making credit eligibility determinations. In 2005, the FCRA was amended to create the financial information exception which permitted consumers’ medical financial information to obtained and used by creditors in connection with credit eligibility determinations if certain conditions were met.
The New Rule and the CFPB’s Reasoning
The new rule again amends the FCRA to remove the financial information exception and preclude collection and reporting on consumer medical debt. CFPB research found that medical debt has less predictive value regarding future defaults than other debt. The CFPB also found that creditors were giving medical debt less weight than other debt in evaluating credit worthiness, undercutting evidence or reasoning supporting the exception. The CFPB research concluded that consumer medical debt could not be meaningfully connected to future loan payments because medical debt often occurs because of unique circumstances and incidents out of the control of the consumer.
The CFPB asserts that the new limitation on collecting and reporting consumer medical debt better serves congresses intent in enacting the FCRA, to safeguard consumers’ privacy. The FCRA does still allow collecting and reporting some medical related information, such as income from disability benefits.
Consumer Reporting Agencies Beware
Section 1022.38 details how a consumer reporting agency’s medical debt information reporting responsibilities ae impacted when creditors are prohibited from obtaining or using medical debt information. The new rule appears to put an additional investigatory obligation on consumer reporting agencies when disclosing consumer medical debt to a creditor. A consumer reporting agency is only permitted to include medical debt information in a consumer report furnished to a creditor if the following criteria are met: (1) the consumer reporting agency has reason to believe the creditor intends to use the medical debt information in a manner not prohibited; and (2) the consumer reporting agency has reason to believe the creditor is not legally prohibited from obtaining or using the medical debt information, including under any State law that prohibits a creditor from obtaining or using medical debt information.
The new rule also uses a broad definition of medical debt that includes any debt that was once owed to a medical provider. Consumer reporting agencies may need to exercise caution in reporting debt information received from debt collection agencies if the same could be traced back to a medical provider or medical device.
Baker Sterchi’s Financial Services Practice Group is here to help you with any questions or concerns that may arise as a result of the new rule.
CFPB Rule Precluding Reporting of Consumer Medical Debt On Hold Until June or Later ...

About Financial Services Law Blog
Baker Sterchi's Financial Services Law Blog explores current events, litigation trends, regulations, and hot topics in the financial services industry. This blog informs readers of issues affecting a wide range of financial services, including mortgage lending, auto finance, and credit card/retail transactions. Learn more about the editor, Megan Stumph-Turner, and our Financial Services practice.
Subscribe via email
Subscribe to rss feeds
RSS FeedsABOUT baker sterchi blogs
Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC (Baker Sterchi) publishes this website as a service to our clients, colleagues and others, for informational purposes only. These materials are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship, and are not a substitute for sound legal advice. You should not base any action or lack of action on any information included in our website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. If you contact us through our website or via email, no attorney-client relationship is created, and no confidential information should be transmitted. Communication with Baker Sterchi by e-mail or other transmissions over the Internet may not be secure, and you should not send confidential electronic messages that are not adequately encrypted.
The hiring of an attorney is an important decision, which should not be based solely on information appearing on our website. To the extent our website has provided links to other Internet resources, those links are not under our control, and we are not responsible for their content. We do our best to provide you current, accurate information; however, we cannot guarantee that this information is the most current, correct or complete. In addition, you should not take this information as a promise or indication of future results.
Disclaimer
The Financial Services Law Blog is made available by Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. Your use of this blog site alone creates no attorney client relationship between you and the firm.
Confidential information
Do not include confidential information in comments or other feedback or messages related to the Financial Services Law Blog, as these are neither confidential nor secure methods of communicating with attorneys. The Financial Services Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.