Class Actions Based on Wrongful Application Of Labor Depreciation In Property Insurance Claims Are Active In Missouri
Three separate class actions have been filed in Missouri challenging how depreciation is used in calculating the actual cash value of property damage under homeowners and commercial property insurance policies. In the past insurers used replacement-cost-less-depreciation to calculate actual cash value. This calculation takes the entire estimated replacement cost of property (materials, labor and other items) and depreciates the property based on age and condition. The Missouri class actions allege only materials should be depreciated as a component of the replacement cost, and labor should not be depreciated.
The Missouri class actions raising the labor depreciation issue are McLaughlin v. Fire Insurance. Exchange., 1316-CV11140 (16th Circuit Court for Jackson County, Mo.); Bellamy v. Nationwide Affinity Insurance Company, 1516-CV06346 (16th Circuit Court for Jackson County, Mo.); and Riggins v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, 2:14-cv-04171-NKL (W.D. Mo.). No rulings on the merits or class certification in any of the three class actions have been rendered.
related services
About Insurance Law Blog
Baker Sterchi's Insurance Blog examines topics and developments of interest to insurance carriers, with a particular focus on the Midwest and Pacific Northwest, including Missouri, Kansas, Illinois, Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. Learn more about the editor, Philip Sumner, and our Insurance practice.
Subscribe via email
Subscribe to rss feeds
RSS FeedsABOUT baker sterchi blogs
Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC (Baker Sterchi) publishes this website as a service to our clients, colleagues and others, for informational purposes only. These materials are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship, and are not a substitute for sound legal advice. You should not base any action or lack of action on any information included in our website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. If you contact us through our website or via email, no attorney-client relationship is created, and no confidential information should be transmitted. Communication with Baker Sterchi by e-mail or other transmissions over the Internet may not be secure, and you should not send confidential electronic messages that are not adequately encrypted.
The hiring of an attorney is an important decision, which should not be based solely on information appearing on our website. To the extent our website has provided links to other Internet resources, those links are not under our control, and we are not responsible for their content. We do our best to provide you current, accurate information; however, we cannot guarantee that this information is the most current, correct or complete. In addition, you should not take this information as a promise or indication of future results.
Disclaimer
The Insurance Law Blog is made available by Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. Your use of this blog site alone creates no attorney client relationship between you and the firm.
Confidential information
Do not include confidential information in comments or other feedback or messages related to the Insurance Law Blog, as these are neither confidential nor secure methods of communicating with attorneys. The Insurance Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.