EEOC continues to prioritize its focus on the use of artificial intelligence in employment decisions.
ABSTRACT: The EEOC continues to focus on the application of the federal employment laws it enforces to the use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) and other automated systems in employment decisions. Most recently, the EEOC held a public hearing on January 31st. The stated goal of the hearing was two-fold: (1) educate a broader audience about potential civil rights implications from the use of AI and automated systems; and (2) to identify the EEOC’s next steps to prevent and eliminate unlawful bias so that this technology does not become a pathway to discrimination.
The EEOC’s continues to prioritize its focus on the emerging topic of the use of artificial intelligence and other technologies in making employment decisions. The EEOC first announced its Artificial Intelligence initiative in 2021. The initiative was created to ensure the use of software, including AI and other technologies used in employment decisions, comply with the federal employment laws it is tasked with enforcing.
As part of the AI initiative announced in 2021, the EEOC advised it would: issue technical assistance to provide guidance on the use of AI in employment decisions, identify promising practices, hold listening sessions with key stakeholders about algorithmic tools and employment ramifications, and gather information about the adoption, design, and impact of hiring and other employment-related technologies.
In 2022, the EEOC carried out these efforts, issuing a video, “Use of Artificial Intelligence in Making Job Decisions for People with Disabilities”, as well as publishing the following guidance: “Tips for Workers: The American with Disabilities Act and the Use of Software, Algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence” and “The Americans with Disabilities Act and the Use of Software, Algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence to Assess Job Applicants and Employees”. The Commission also held numerous education sessions for human resources professionals that focused on AI and employment decisions, offering HRCI, SHRM, and CLE credits.
Then, the EEOC started off this year with a public hearing titled “Navigating Employment Discrimination in AI and Automated Systems: A New Civil Rights Frontier”, with nearly 3,000 members of the public attending. Employer representatives, legal experts, industrial-organizational psychologists, computer scientists, and civil rights advocates spoke at this public hearing. Generally, the discussion addressed how the use of AI could potentially result in discriminatory employment decisions, as well as ways that AI and automated systems might help or obstruct diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility endeavors. The EEOC invited the public to submit written comments on the use of AI and automated systems through February 15th.
Key Takeaway
In the coming years, the EEOC is expected to continue its strong focus on AI and its use in employment decision-making, including the issuance of additional publications and guidance addressing the application of anti-discrimination laws to AI and other automated systems. While the initial guidance issued by the EEOC addressed concerns under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the scope of topics tackled at the most recent public hearing was much broader, discussing the potential impact of AI on all classes protected under federal law. The Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice Employment Practice Group will continue to follow this emerging topic and will provide updates as more information becomes available.
Employers Subject to More Lenient Standard for FLSA Exemptions from Minimum Wage and Overtime Pay Provisions ...

Requirements of the New Illinois Pay Transparency Amendment ...
About Employment & Labor Law Blog
Baker Sterchi's Employment & Labor Law Blog examines topics and developments of interest to employers, Human Resources professionals, and others with an interest in recent legal developments concerning the workplace. This blog is focused on the Midwest and Pacific Northwest, including Missouri, Kansas, Illinois, Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, and on major developments under federal law, and at the EEOC and NLRB. Learn more about the editor, David M. Eisenberg, and our Employment & Labor practice.
Subscribe via email
Subscribe to rss feeds
RSS FeedsABOUT baker sterchi blogs
Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC (Baker Sterchi) publishes this website as a service to our clients, colleagues and others, for informational purposes only. These materials are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship, and are not a substitute for sound legal advice. You should not base any action or lack of action on any information included in our website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. If you contact us through our website or via email, no attorney-client relationship is created, and no confidential information should be transmitted. Communication with Baker Sterchi by e-mail or other transmissions over the Internet may not be secure, and you should not send confidential electronic messages that are not adequately encrypted.
The hiring of an attorney is an important decision, which should not be based solely on information appearing on our website. To the extent our website has provided links to other Internet resources, those links are not under our control, and we are not responsible for their content. We do our best to provide you current, accurate information; however, we cannot guarantee that this information is the most current, correct or complete. In addition, you should not take this information as a promise or indication of future results.
Disclaimer
The Employment & Labor Law Blog is made available by Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. Your use of this blog site alone creates no attorney client relationship between you and the firm.
Confidential information
Do not include confidential information in comments or other feedback or messages related to the Employment & Labor Law Blog, as these are neither confidential nor secure methods of communicating with attorneys. The Employment & Labor Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.