FAA's proposed rules for small commercial drones
The FAA announced its proposed rules for small commercial drones (small unmanned aircraft/aerial systems “UAS”) in February 2015. See Small UAS NPRM (available at www.faa.gov). While the proposed rules are more lenient than many in the industry had anticipated, they are still stringent enough to prevent the use of UAS in many of the ways envisioned by some commercial entities.
Much of the proposed rule is dedicated to addressing the FAA’s concern that the UAS operator has the ability to see and avoid other aircraft. As the FAA reiterates in the proposed rule, the most basic responsibility of any aircraft operator is to avoid collisions with other aircraft. In fulfilling this fundamental responsibility, the FAA emphasizes the need for operators to exercise the basic flying technique of “see and avoid.” Due to a pilot’s ability to utilize peripheral vision while in the cockpit of a manned aircraft, the FAA believes that pilots of manned aircrafts are in a far better position to exercise see-and-avoid techniques than operators of unmanned aircraft using First Person View (FPV) or cameras. For this reason, the FAA’s proposed rule contains a Visual Line of Sight (“VLOS”) requirement, which requires UAS operators to maintain visual contact with the UAS at all times (though permitting the operator to use a second operator as a forward observer). The VLOS requirement presents a formidable obstacle to those wishing to utilize UAS’s commercially, and at least in the near future likely will restrict commercial UAS usage to activities such as photography, power line inspections, search and rescue, and crop monitoring.
As to those wishing to use commercial drones in a manner that will require their operation beyond the operator’s line of sight, such as delivering most products, the FAA clearly has recognized that the proposed rule is just the initial step on what it anticipates to be a long journey to complete UAS integration. Indeed, the FAA’s Notice of Proposed Rule Making leaves open the possibility for developing standards for operations beyond visual line-of-sight activities.
Recent comments from the leader of FAA’s Integration Office, Jim Williams, also provide a reason for optimism regarding the potential for beyond line of sight operations in the future. Speaking at the Drones, Data X Conference in Santa Cruz, California on May 1, 2015, Williams acknowledged that “we [the FAA] understand there is a lot of value in flying out of line of sight and that is one of the areas we are looking to get ahead rapidly in the next few years.” Williams did not provide a timeline on when such regulations may be changed but noted that, as sensor technology continues to evolve, drones will become safer and the need for a nearby pilot less necessary. Though he provided no timeline for the implementation of new regulations easing the VLOS requirement, Williams pointed out that as sensor technology continues to improve, and UAS become safer, the need for an operator to be nearby will be diminished. Williams explained his belief that sensor technology eventually will be able to permit an operator to see and avoid other aircraft, thus enabling beyond line of sight operation.
Stay tuned to this blog for updates regarding potentially industry-shifting developments, including the scaling back of the VLOS requirement.
related services

Medical Causation Opinion Excluded in Toxic Exposure FELA Case ...

About Transportation Law Blog
Baker Sterchi's Transportation Law Blog explores significant issues and developments of interest to various participants in the aerospace, railroad, and trucking communities. Topics range from proposed regulatory changes to key court decisions. Learn more about our aerospace, automotive and heavy equipment, railroad and trucking practices.
Subscribe via email
Subscribe to rss feeds
RSS FeedsABOUT baker sterchi blogs
Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC (Baker Sterchi) publishes this website as a service to our clients, colleagues and others, for informational purposes only. These materials are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship, and are not a substitute for sound legal advice. You should not base any action or lack of action on any information included in our website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. If you contact us through our website or via email, no attorney-client relationship is created, and no confidential information should be transmitted. Communication with Baker Sterchi by e-mail or other transmissions over the Internet may not be secure, and you should not send confidential electronic messages that are not adequately encrypted.
The hiring of an attorney is an important decision, which should not be based solely on information appearing on our website. To the extent our website has provided links to other Internet resources, those links are not under our control, and we are not responsible for their content. We do our best to provide you current, accurate information; however, we cannot guarantee that this information is the most current, correct or complete. In addition, you should not take this information as a promise or indication of future results.
Disclaimer
The Transportation Law Blog is made available by Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. Your use of this blog site alone creates no attorney client relationship between you and the firm.
Confidential information
Do not include confidential information in comments or other feedback or messages related to the Transportation Law Blog, as these are neither confidential nor secure methods of communicating with attorneys. The Transportation Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.