Healthcare Unionization: Navigating the New Labor Landscape
ABSTRACT: With unionization efforts on the rise among healthcare professionals, including physicians, employers must stay informed on evolving labor laws and the NLRB. Learn how proactive engagement, including reviewing restrictive covenants, can help maintain a stable workforce.
As we have already reported, NLRB may as well stand for “No Longer Relegated to the Backburner.” Unions and the National Labor Relations Board are active all across the country and in all types of industries. The healthcare industry is no exception. These changes go beyond impacting the nursing staff or environmental services staff; they are affecting physicians as well. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board certified the union election in Minnesota of more than 130 Allina doctors at Mercy and Unity Hospitals. This certification and election result may be a harbinger of changes to come. Healthcare employers need to follow the legal landscape surrounding these important union updates or risk being caught off-guard in this new labor environment.
As in other industries, concerns about burnout, increasing demand for services, and a younger generation asking for more work-life balance should not be ignored. Asking younger physicians who feel burnt out or stressed to accept that the practice of medicine is simply a “calling” is not a good labor relations tactic. If employers refuse to answer these calls for help, Union infrastructure is ready to listen to physicians who could be feeling unheard.
Healthcare professionals should anticipate unionization efforts and ensure their workplace practices are union neutral. The recent NLRB opinions are good starting points for any in-house risk manager or corporate counsel for hospitals that have not predicted or anticipated this sudden change in the union landscape.
Restrictive covenants will be placed squarely in its crosshairs if and when physicians unionize. The NLRB General Counsel has cautioned that overbroad non-competes are “unlawful because they chill employees from exercising their rights under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, which protects employees’ rights to take collective action to improve their working conditions.” These covenants also may interfere with employees’ rights to participate in collective bargaining.
These restrictive covenants, common in the healthcare industry, are designed to prevent the poaching of valuable talent and protect patient relationships.
Even if your hospital or medical group is not facing a union campaign, overbroad restrictive covenants should be revised to avoid employee dissatisfaction and potential legal challenges. This includes narrowly tailoring these provisions to your organization’s objectives and avoiding unduly restricting a physician’s rights. If this language has not been updated in a while, now is a great time to consider whether the contractual language is consistent with state and/or recent NLRB opinions.
By staying informed on labor relations, healthcare employers can position themselves advantageously in this rapidly changing environment. Medical professionals are increasingly similar to other professionals in the modern workforce, with evolving expectations of what a work-life balance means to them and what they believe union membership can offer. This shift offers healthcare employers an opportunity to address employees’ concerns and manage labor relations effectively and proactively. While not all changes are foreseeable, staying vigilant and adhering to best practices in labor law will allow employers to maintain a stable, engaged, and productive workforce.related services
Missouri Proposition A Increases Minimum Wage to $15 starting in 2026. ...
About Employment & Labor Law Blog
Baker Sterchi's Employment & Labor Law Blog examines topics and developments of interest to employers, Human Resources professionals, and others with an interest in recent legal developments concerning the workplace. This blog is focused on the Midwest and Pacific Northwest, including Missouri, Kansas, Illinois, Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, and on major developments under federal law, and at the EEOC and NLRB. Learn more about the editor, David M. Eisenberg, and our Employment & Labor practice.
Subscribe via email
Subscribe to rss feeds
RSS FeedsABOUT baker sterchi blogs
Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC (Baker Sterchi) publishes this website as a service to our clients, colleagues and others, for informational purposes only. These materials are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship, and are not a substitute for sound legal advice. You should not base any action or lack of action on any information included in our website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. If you contact us through our website or via email, no attorney-client relationship is created, and no confidential information should be transmitted. Communication with Baker Sterchi by e-mail or other transmissions over the Internet may not be secure, and you should not send confidential electronic messages that are not adequately encrypted.
The hiring of an attorney is an important decision, which should not be based solely on information appearing on our website. To the extent our website has provided links to other Internet resources, those links are not under our control, and we are not responsible for their content. We do our best to provide you current, accurate information; however, we cannot guarantee that this information is the most current, correct or complete. In addition, you should not take this information as a promise or indication of future results.
Disclaimer
The Employment & Labor Law Blog is made available by Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. Your use of this blog site alone creates no attorney client relationship between you and the firm.
Confidential information
Do not include confidential information in comments or other feedback or messages related to the Employment & Labor Law Blog, as these are neither confidential nor secure methods of communicating with attorneys. The Employment & Labor Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.