Let's Talk About the New Law Impacting Accommodations for Pregnant Workers
ABSTRACT: The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) went into effect on June 27, 2023. This new law requires employers with at least 15 employees to provide “reasonable accommodations” to employees known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions, unless the accommodation will cause the employer an “undue hardship”.
The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) went into effect on June 27, 2023. The Act is intended to fill gaps between the protections already afforded pregnant workers under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978.
Under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, employers are required to treat employees affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions the same as other similarly situated employees. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, pregnancy itself is not a disability. Rather, a pregnant applicant or employee would be entitled to protection under the Americans with Disabilities Act, only if the pregnant employee had a medical condition that satisfied the definition of a disability under that Act. In other words, in order to be afforded the benefits and protections available under the ADA, the individual would need to establish that she had a physical or mental condition that substantially limited one or more major life activities. As you can imagine, while conditions such as preeclampsia (a serious blood pressure condition that can develop during pregnancy) might qualify as a disability, many other commonly known pregnancy-related limitations were not covered, meaning the employer was not required to provide the pregnant worker a reasonable accommodation for those conditions.
Under the PWFA, this new law requires employers with at least 15 employees to provide “reasonable accommodations” to employees known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions, unless the accommodation will cause the employer an “undue hardship”. This is what we know so far about a “known limitation”. It must be a “physical or mental condition” that is related to pregnancy, childbirth, or a related condition that the employee has communicated to the employer.
The Act also directs the EEOC to enact regulations within one year that include examples of reasonable accommodations. While we wait for those regulations, the EEOC has already issued Frequently Asked Questions, which provide some examples that may be appropriate for pregnant workers. See EEOC PWFA FAQ. Relying on the House Committee on Education and Labor Report on the PWFA, hyperlinked here, the EEOC notes the following possible accommodations:
- Ability to sit or drink water;
- Receive closer parking;
- Have flexible hours;
- Receive appropriately sized uniforms and safety apparel;
- Receive additional break time to use the bathroom, eat, and rest;
- Take leave or time off to recover from childbirth; and
- To be excused from strenuous activities and/or activities that involve exposure to compounds not safe for pregnancy.
See EEOC PWFA FAQ.
The PWFA also prohibits employers from:
- requiring employees to take leave (paid or unpaid), if another reasonable accommodation can be provided that would allow the employee to keep working;
- denying a job or other employment opportunities to employees based on the need to make reasonable accommodations;
- interfering with an employee’s rights under the Act;
- requiring employees to accept a reasonable accommodation without a discussion (interactive process) about the accommodation with the employee; and
- retaliating against employees for reporting or opposing conduct made unlawful under the Act or due to the employee’s participation in a PWFA proceeding.
Final Points
The EEOC began accepting charges alleging violations of the PWFA on June 27, 2023, the Act’s effective date. Individuals alleging violations of the PWFA may also include alleged violations of the PDA and ADA. The Act is not retroactive, so any claims for failure to provide a reasonable accommodation that occurred prior to June 27, 2023 cannot be based on the PWFA and will need to satisfy the requirements of either the more narrow ADA or PDA.
With the expansion of rights provided under the Act to pregnant applicants and employees, this would be a good time to review your business’s accommodation policies and procedures for compliance and to provide training to managers and human resource personnel to ensure they understand the new obligations and protections created by the PWFA.
8th Circuit Changes Course in Standing for States to Sue EEOC over Pregnant Workers Fairness Act ...

Truck Driver Misclassification Claim Can Move Forward as Collective Action Under FLSA ...
About Employment & Labor Law Blog
Baker Sterchi's Employment & Labor Law Blog examines topics and developments of interest to employers, Human Resources professionals, and others with an interest in recent legal developments concerning the workplace. This blog is focused on the Midwest and Pacific Northwest, including Missouri, Kansas, Illinois, Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, and on major developments under federal law, and at the EEOC and NLRB. Learn more about the editor, David M. Eisenberg, and our Employment & Labor practice.
Subscribe via email
Subscribe to rss feeds
RSS FeedsABOUT baker sterchi blogs
Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC (Baker Sterchi) publishes this website as a service to our clients, colleagues and others, for informational purposes only. These materials are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship, and are not a substitute for sound legal advice. You should not base any action or lack of action on any information included in our website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. If you contact us through our website or via email, no attorney-client relationship is created, and no confidential information should be transmitted. Communication with Baker Sterchi by e-mail or other transmissions over the Internet may not be secure, and you should not send confidential electronic messages that are not adequately encrypted.
The hiring of an attorney is an important decision, which should not be based solely on information appearing on our website. To the extent our website has provided links to other Internet resources, those links are not under our control, and we are not responsible for their content. We do our best to provide you current, accurate information; however, we cannot guarantee that this information is the most current, correct or complete. In addition, you should not take this information as a promise or indication of future results.
Disclaimer
The Employment & Labor Law Blog is made available by Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. Your use of this blog site alone creates no attorney client relationship between you and the firm.
Confidential information
Do not include confidential information in comments or other feedback or messages related to the Employment & Labor Law Blog, as these are neither confidential nor secure methods of communicating with attorneys. The Employment & Labor Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.