They're Baaaaccckkkk: New COVID-19 Guidelines for Your Vaxed and Vexed Employees
ABSTRACT: Remember May 13, 2021? The day the CDC gloriously lifted the mask mandate for fully vaccinated individuals? Well, in the words of Heather O'Rourke in Poltergeist II…"They're baaaaccck." But this time, its masks – not evil spirits.
In November 2020, many Americans breathed a sigh of relief, as news broke that an effective and safe vaccine had been developed against COVID-19. As vaccines from Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson began to roll out in early 2021, numerous citizens began to roll up their sleeves for protection against the virus. In May 2021, many COVID-19 related restrictions were abandoned in the continental U.S. (including the dreaded indoor mask requirement) after the CDC advised that vaccinated individuals did not need to wear masks while indoors.
Fast forward to August 2021, and the unwelcome spread of the highly contagious Delta variant, and we seem to be creeping back to mandatory mask wearing in many states, as the CDC recently recommended that fully vaccinated individuals wear masks in public indoor settings in areas of “substantial or high transmission.” This recommendation comes as no surprise with the Delta variant on the rise, coupled with the fact that vaccinated individuals can still become sick from the virus, as well as transmit the virus.
So what is an employer to do with these new CDC guidelines? While the new guidelines do not define “public indoor settings,” such settings were previously differentiated by the CDC from household settings. Hence, it is safe to say these new guidelines apply to businesses outside of individuals’ homes. Because it is assumed that these guidelines pertain to companies, employers and businesses should consult with the CDC’s COVID-19 Integrated County View website (covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#county-view) to determine if the areas in which they do business are COVID-19 hotspots with substantial or high transmission. This website is updated by the CDC daily, reflecting locations that have substantial transmission or high transmission over a 7-day period.
While CDC guidelines are not considered “law,” OSHA and the courts could interpret CDC guidelines to be a standard of care. Accordingly, in the event an employer does not abide by the new CDC guidelines, OSHA could cite an employer for not abiding by the guidelines, on the grounds that the employer breached the OSHA “general duty clause.” In addition, individuals who contract the virus while visiting non-CDC abiding businesses may sue, claiming that the business was negligent by not abiding by the respective restrictions. Although CDC guidelines are just that – guidelines – employers and businesses should therefore heed the CDC’s guidance… to the possible dismay of your some of your vaxed and vexed employees.Missouri Proposition A Increases Minimum Wage to $15 starting in 2026. ...
Healthcare Unionization: Navigating the New Labor Landscape ...
About Employment & Labor Law Blog
Baker Sterchi's Employment & Labor Law Blog examines topics and developments of interest to employers, Human Resources professionals, and others with an interest in recent legal developments concerning the workplace. This blog is focused on the Midwest and Pacific Northwest, including Missouri, Kansas, Illinois, Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, and on major developments under federal law, and at the EEOC and NLRB. Learn more about the editor, David M. Eisenberg, and our Employment & Labor practice.
Subscribe via email
Subscribe to rss feeds
RSS FeedsABOUT baker sterchi blogs
Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC (Baker Sterchi) publishes this website as a service to our clients, colleagues and others, for informational purposes only. These materials are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship, and are not a substitute for sound legal advice. You should not base any action or lack of action on any information included in our website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. If you contact us through our website or via email, no attorney-client relationship is created, and no confidential information should be transmitted. Communication with Baker Sterchi by e-mail or other transmissions over the Internet may not be secure, and you should not send confidential electronic messages that are not adequately encrypted.
The hiring of an attorney is an important decision, which should not be based solely on information appearing on our website. To the extent our website has provided links to other Internet resources, those links are not under our control, and we are not responsible for their content. We do our best to provide you current, accurate information; however, we cannot guarantee that this information is the most current, correct or complete. In addition, you should not take this information as a promise or indication of future results.
Disclaimer
The Employment & Labor Law Blog is made available by Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. Your use of this blog site alone creates no attorney client relationship between you and the firm.
Confidential information
Do not include confidential information in comments or other feedback or messages related to the Employment & Labor Law Blog, as these are neither confidential nor secure methods of communicating with attorneys. The Employment & Labor Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.